<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Trippiest Part of Ham Amateur Radio Test Textbook by Radio Scxhack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T-Omegathy</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-137053</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Omegathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-137053</guid>
		<description>Why is that Ben? My terms of service is meant to render at the commencement of our communication a clear statement about my terms and expectations. I feel like the clarity of communication, protocol and ritual involved in Amateur Radio is a major part of what draws me to that field to begin with. I'd hope that my interest in simply holding guests on my website accountable for their own words won't limit or inhibit anyone's ability to authentically express themselves. That's not what this forum is for. Everything here by me, 7,000+ articles over 6 years on highly specialized sets of information is granted to the Public Domain perpetually and I ask that my correspondents and contributors follow that same spirit of Free, True &#038; Open-Ended communication. 

Cheers! 

Respectfully yours,

Tim Boucher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that Ben? My terms of service is meant to render at the commencement of our communication a clear statement about my terms and expectations. I feel like the clarity of communication, protocol and ritual involved in Amateur Radio is a major part of what draws me to that field to begin with. I&#8217;d hope that my interest in simply holding guests on my website accountable for their own words won&#8217;t limit or inhibit anyone&#8217;s ability to authentically express themselves. That&#8217;s not what this forum is for. Everything here by me, 7,000+ articles over 6 years on highly specialized sets of information is granted to the Public Domain perpetually and I ask that my correspondents and contributors follow that same spirit of Free, True &#038; Open-Ended communication. </p>
<p>Cheers! </p>
<p>Respectfully yours,</p>
<p>Tim Boucher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben, N1WBV</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-137050</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben, N1WBV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-137050</guid>
		<description>Wow. I just spent about 15 minutes commenting on this, but then I read the ToS. Yikes. No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I just spent about 15 minutes commenting on this, but then I read the ToS. Yikes. No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136652</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136652</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Microbroadcasting usually serves a town or community which doesn’t hear
what it wants on commercial radio.  A 100-watt FM signal will travel
approximately 20 miles, while a 100-watt AM signal can typically be heard
for 30 miles; however, most microbroadcasts fall in the range of 15-30 watts,
with an audible range of 10-12 miles.
     There’s only one problem.  AM or FM microbroadcasts with power
greater than 1/4 watt are illegal, and the Federal Communications
Commission will only license FM or AM broadcasters with a power of 100
watts or above.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Lounge/7704/micro.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Microbroadcasting usually serves a town or community which doesn’t hear<br />
what it wants on commercial radio.  A 100-watt FM signal will travel<br />
approximately 20 miles, while a 100-watt AM signal can typically be heard<br />
for 30 miles; however, most microbroadcasts fall in the range of 15-30 watts,<br />
with an audible range of 10-12 miles.<br />
     There’s only one problem.  AM or FM microbroadcasts with power<br />
greater than 1/4 watt are illegal, and the Federal Communications<br />
Commission will only license FM or AM broadcasters with a power of 100<br />
watts or above.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Lounge/7704/micro.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Lounge/7704/micro.html'>http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Lounge/7704/micro.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136641</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136641</guid>
		<description>The actual ham operators - that document claims - didn't partake in any of the shenanigans. But there is most assuredly a wealth of forgotten lore and history here: a point when people actually were informed about broadcast rights and technological equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual ham operators - that document claims - didn&#8217;t partake in any of the shenanigans. But there is most assuredly a wealth of forgotten lore and history here: a point when people actually were informed about broadcast rights and technological equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Boland</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136581</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Boland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136581</guid>
		<description>you've uncovered a forgotten revolution, tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;ve uncovered a forgotten revolution, tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136572</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136572</guid>
		<description>http://ham-shack.com/history06.html

&lt;blockquote&gt;Pandemonium broke out.
  Stations, liberated from all Federal control, upped their power, jumped
  frequency, and/or began full time operations on daytime or time shared
  frequencies. Smaller stations were jammed off the air. Unlicensed
  transmitters appeared out of nowhere, dropped down on any convenient (or
  inconvenient) frequency, and began broadcasting. Anarchy was King&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://ham-shack.com/history07.html

&lt;blockquote&gt;Democracy was still a foreign idea to most nations; many hovered in that gray area between Old World Monarchy
  and Fascism/Communism.  Communications were a government monopoly.&#160; Individual private stations were feared; they could compete with
  the Government Stations, or they could be used in anti-government activities.  This attitude was even present in the representatives
  from England and France.  As for the other countries, many were blatantly anti amateur radio.  Germany, for example, stated that
  private stations could violate "the rights of the State".&#160; Switzerland was on the record against amateur radio.  Japan would
  tolerate amateurs, however they would have to use "phantom" (i.e.  non radiating ) antennas.  In other words, you could have
  a transmitter, you just couldn't radiate a signal!!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ham-shack.com/history06.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://ham-shack.com/history06.html'>http://ham-shack.com/history06.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Pandemonium broke out.<br />
  Stations, liberated from all Federal control, upped their power, jumped<br />
  frequency, and/or began full time operations on daytime or time shared<br />
  frequencies. Smaller stations were jammed off the air. Unlicensed<br />
  transmitters appeared out of nowhere, dropped down on any convenient (or<br />
  inconvenient) frequency, and began broadcasting. Anarchy was King</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ham-shack.com/history07.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://ham-shack.com/history07.html'>http://ham-shack.com/history07.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Democracy was still a foreign idea to most nations; many hovered in that gray area between Old World Monarchy<br />
  and Fascism/Communism.  Communications were a government monopoly.&nbsp; Individual private stations were feared; they could compete with<br />
  the Government Stations, or they could be used in anti-government activities.  This attitude was even present in the representatives<br />
  from England and France.  As for the other countries, many were blatantly anti amateur radio.  Germany, for example, stated that<br />
  private stations could violate &#8220;the rights of the State&#8221;.&nbsp; Switzerland was on the record against amateur radio.  Japan would<br />
  tolerate amateurs, however they would have to use &#8220;phantom&#8221; (i.e.  non radiating ) antennas.  In other words, you could have<br />
  a transmitter, you just couldn&#8217;t radiate a signal!!!!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136532</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136532</guid>
		<description>From that link above and there's another one I'll find as well

&lt;blockquote&gt;After amateurs had returned to the air in November 1919, hundreds of them began to explore the area of broadcasting. In May, 1920, amateur station 8XK joined many other hams in the transmission of music. Incidentally, it WAS LEGAL for amateurs to broadcast music, news, sports, lectures, advertisements or indeed just about anything else they wanted. The Radio Act of 1912, still in effect, did not mention amateurs, rather, one paragraph made a general reference to individual private or commercial stations. The only real restriction was the 1 kw power limit and the 200 meter wavelength, after that, the government didn't care. Thus, those amateurs who had built equipment to modulate their CW transmitters eventually played a phonograph record or two, sang (or tried to sing), or broadcast some form of entertainment. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From that link above and there&#8217;s another one I&#8217;ll find as well</p>
<blockquote><p>After amateurs had returned to the air in November 1919, hundreds of them began to explore the area of broadcasting. In May, 1920, amateur station 8XK joined many other hams in the transmission of music. Incidentally, it WAS LEGAL for amateurs to broadcast music, news, sports, lectures, advertisements or indeed just about anything else they wanted. The Radio Act of 1912, still in effect, did not mention amateurs, rather, one paragraph made a general reference to individual private or commercial stations. The only real restriction was the 1 kw power limit and the 200 meter wavelength, after that, the government didn&#8217;t care. Thus, those amateurs who had built equipment to modulate their CW transmitters eventually played a phonograph record or two, sang (or tried to sing), or broadcast some form of entertainment. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Boland</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136492</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Boland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136492</guid>
		<description>How much of reality are US citizens allowed to see? That's a question that interests me a lot, as a co-developer of OmniPanOpticon technology that allows for ubiquitous global surveillance in the public domain.  

Which is, of course, utterly illegal. The compartmentalization of information is much like any other religious axiom: totally absurd upon examination, but circularly airtight upon ingestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of reality are US citizens allowed to see? That&#8217;s a question that interests me a lot, as a co-developer of OmniPanOpticon technology that allows for ubiquitous global surveillance in the public domain.  </p>
<p>Which is, of course, utterly illegal. The compartmentalization of information is much like any other religious axiom: totally absurd upon examination, but circularly airtight upon ingestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remote presence</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136485</link>
		<dc:creator>remote presence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136485</guid>
		<description>http://ham-shack.com/history05.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ham-shack.com/history05.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://ham-shack.com/history05.html'>http://ham-shack.com/history05.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136477</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136477</guid>
		<description>i'm not sure how they evolved. thats an important subject my textbook fails to address</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure how they evolved. thats an important subject my textbook fails to address</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nitro2k01</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2009/01/18/most-trippiest-part-of-ham-amateur-radio-test-textbook-by-radio-scxhack/comment-page-1/#comment-136474</link>
		<dc:creator>nitro2k01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/?p=8650#comment-136474</guid>
		<description>What if these rules are not originally FCC's idea, but a request from ham operators/adaptation of existing rules that there was a consensus about among hams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if these rules are not originally FCC&#8217;s idea, but a request from ham operators/adaptation of existing rules that there was a consensus about among hams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
