Transmission of Perceiving Centers, Continuity, State Management

This might be a bit of a psifi reach, but let’s grab a couple documents here for an old-fashioned reference point mash-up accompanied by some wild speculation (the very best kind):

NASA also used synthetic vision for remotely piloted vehicles (RPVs), such as the High Maneuvability Aerial Testbed or HiMAT (see Sarrafian, 1984). According to the report by NASA, the aircraft was flown by a pilot in a remote cockpit, and control signals up-linked from the flight controls in the remote cockpit on the ground to the aircraft, and aircraft telemetry downlinked to the remote cockpit displays (see photo). The remote cockpit could be configured with either nose camera video or with a 3D synthetic vision display. SV was also used for simulations of the HiMAT. Sarrafian reports that the test pilots found the visual display to be comparable to output of camera on-board the RPV.

Okay, now overlay that against the grain we’ve been pushing on the subject of swapping bodies, sensory substitution, spooky identity-at-a-distance effects of ambient intelligent everyware environments, all that good-stuff.

Imagine, for a second, the ability to transmit a human perceiving center through 4D timespace (ie, ordinary reality) via something which looks like this:


signal_e_a000771116.jpg

predator1oclock.jpg

050926-f-0000r-101.jpg

zephyr.jpg

Today there’s a guy operating a remote. Tomorrow there’s an operator somewhere jumping in and out of technological bodies, shepherding swarms of intelligent machines in self-organizing patterns in his transidental datawake.


- END -

ASSOCIATED CONTENT BY TIM BOUCHER (Auto-Generated)

3 Comments

  1. Posted January 21, 2009 at 1:53 am | Permalink

    Although definitions vary, NASA’s team decided “enhanced vision” refers to sensor-based means of giving pilots information about terrain and man-made features when visibility is obscured. “Synthetic vision” is an artificial, computer-generated view based on a detailed terrain database. Combining the two can either be done via “fusion”–creating one image by melding sensor and database elements–or “integration,” which overlays sensor and terrain data.

    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic...hannel=awst&id=news/08094top.xml

  2. Posted January 21, 2009 at 2:08 am | Permalink

    Synthetic reality is poised to finally deliver on promise – to give people a life that is equal, a level playing field. Mind over matter. In this case, direct mental communication, and interaction. The person they are inside becomes important NOT the shell they were born with.

    http://www.virtualworldlets.net/Resources/Menu.php?Category=17

  3. Posted January 21, 2009 at 2:11 am | Permalink

    avatar overriding, hijacking other peoples perceptions of you as an entity

    http://www.virtualworldlets.net/Resources/Menu.php?Category=23

    ActiveWorlds: Avatar Overriding
    VR is not just a chance for you to choose how you would like to be seen, it is a chance for others to choose how they would like to see you. To assign you a form other than the one you chose, and see you in that form, without you ever needing to be aware they are doing it. Simply overriding their perception of you, to be something different.

One Trackback

  1. [...] Presence – Virtual avatars, remote desktops, spooky action at a distance, welcome to the marvelous world of being there without actually being there: telepresence. In New Age parlance, we might reference remote viewing, [...]

Public Domain 2010.TIM BOUCHER RAW!.