Parking is free (but difficult to find)

Don’t have time right this second to develop this into a fully-fledged article, but want to capture and begin developing some of these ideas related to theatre and virtual/augmented computing environments.

Perceiving Centers

God is an intelligible sphere, whose center is everywhere, and whose circumference is nowhere.”

immersive_cocoon4.jpg

Sensorium: The totality of those parts of the brain that receive, process and interpret sensory stimuli. The sensorium is the supposed seat of sensation, the place to which impressions from the external world are conveyed and perceived.

The sensorium also refers to the entire sensory apparatus of the body.

Compare to theatre, from the Greek theatron:

The Greek ancestor of theater is the?tron, “a place for seeing, especially for dramatic representation, theater.” The?tron is derived from the verb the?sthai, “to gaze at, contemplate, view as spectators, especially in the theater,” from the?, “a viewing.”

So, what I’m trying to say is that in an immersive, ambient, ubiquitous, pervasive computing environment, you have a plethora of perceiving centers. Anything which either has or which could be connected to some kind of sensor – whether natural or artificial – becomes a point of witness, a place of experience, a perceiving center.

Perceptual Fields & States

A perceptual field, then, would be whatever is within perceptable range of a given perceiving center (ie, what could be perceived). A given perceiving center’s perceptual field could be described by its field state: what occupies the field at any given moment, what the center is perceiving or witnessing.

When it comes to perception and experience, field states tend to flux: they change over time. So you have sequences or chains of field states as action progresses.

* * *

Cue-to-Cue

Working backstage in technical theatre, I help to progress the action of the play by manipulating elements within the collective sensorium of the audience, the theatron. I do this through coordination with other technical staff members according to timed cues which are embedded within the script and action of the show.

I’ve been thinking a lot about a memory technique called the Roman Room Trick or memory palace, said to go back to ancient and medieval orators and scholars for remembering long sets of information. You’re supposed to step through, in your imagination, a physical place and “embed” along your route segments of the information to be remembered. Then, you can “walk” back through your memory palace and retrieve that information in sequence.

Working in a show is a lot like this: I have certain actions which are associated not just with temporal cues within the show, but which rely on my being within a specific part of the stage or backstage and using particular instruments or objects to help me achieve and action.

[See also: GPS walkabout, songlines]

Also looking at hobo signs, and trail markings of itinerant groups like the Gypsies (I’ve heard a special word used to describe the gypsy signs, but can’t locate it):

hobo-signs-symbols-chalk.jpg

So, I’m thinking you could apply some kind of gestural, symbolic or other language to mixed-reality environments, where the symbols themselves become almost like functional programs which are embedded within rich datascapes…

More to follow – gotta get back to work!


- END -

ASSOCIATED CONTENT BY TIM BOUCHER (Auto-Generated)

5 Comments

  1. Ted
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    I was thinking about this as related to not having too many belongings in ones living space, because everything you own should be an extension of you. So if you have too much clutter your energy is too dispersed.

    So even if you have no computer, you have a psychic connection with all the objects you own. Its called

    pyschometrylooking at computer

    So I think you are computers and the internet “psychometrically”

  2. Ted
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    I meant to type “I think you are looking at computers and the internet psychometrically”

    That’s why it seems like “vaporware” or whatever to skeptics/scientific materialists because they don’t understand psychometry and are even uncomfortable with the role of the observer in quantum physics etc.

    They are never going to acknowledge the existence of a perceptive field because it creates too much cognitive dissonance. You are talking about your spirit leaving the confines of your body.

  3. Ted
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    I read science fiction book by “Verner Vinge” about this character that had a psychic connection with a bunch little nanobot particles floating around in a room.

  4. Posted November 22, 2009 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    You are talking about your spirit leaving the confines of your body.

    Well, not necessarily… I’m more suggesting that a “body” consists more essentially of the instruments with which one uses to perceive or experience. These may or may not actually be physically part of one’s human body. Likewise, one may augment one’s perceptual capacities with instruments exterior to and distant from one’s body.

    I’m also trying to point towards something like a CCTV security system as a “perceptual field” with human and non-human instruments sensing and reacting to changes in an environment. Or, you could look at things like cloud computing and the notion of distributed identities which we discussed at length over months past on this website.

    Basically just trying to come up with a lightweight adaptable linguistic framework to discuss complex states of being… and I’ve still not adequately brought ANIMISM into this picture yet….

  5. Posted November 24, 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Two links left by a friend:

    http://www.physorg.com/news175938091.html
    http://spectrum.ieee.org/podcast/biome...38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IeeeSpectrum+(IEEE+Spectrum)&utm_content=Bloglines

Public Domain 2010.TIM BOUCHER, FALL 2010.